The Science

How much ceramic coating are you actually wasting?

Every time you apply ceramic coating with a standard applicator pad, a proportion of that product never reaches your paint. It soaks into the foam core of the pad and stays there. You're paying for ceramic coating that never gets used.

We tested it. Here's what we found.

The Test

Testing was conducted using 3D Car Care Ceramic Fluid, applied at 1ml per run via syringe to control the volume precisely. Each pad was weighed before and after application to measure exactly how much product was absorbed into the pad rather than transferred to the surface.

Three runs were completed with a standard foam applicator pad and a CoreShield® pad side by side.

Results

Run Standard pad absorbed CoreShield® absorbed Saved
1 1.1g 1.0g 9.1%
2 0.6g 0.9g —
3 0.9g 0.6g 33.3%
Average 0.87g 0.83g ~16% average

What the results show

Runs 1 and 3 confirmed the trend clearly — CoreShield® absorbed less product in both cases, with up to 33.3% less ceramic coating lost into the pad.

Run 2 showed a variance worth explaining: the CoreShield® pad registered a higher absorbed weight in that run. This is consistent with ceramic coating being retained within the microfibre application face rather than passing through into the foam core — exactly the behaviour the CoreShield® Anti-Saturation liner is designed to create. Coating held in the microfibre face is still available to be worked into the paint surface.

What the pads look like

After just two quick passes on the boot lid of a car — that's how quickly a standard pad soaks up product before it reaches the paint.

CoreShield applicator pad in-hand next to a black car's boot lid
Where the test happened — CoreShield® in-hand on a black boot lid.
CoreShield pad on top of standard pad: CoreShield foam remains white, standard pad shows visible pink saturation
CoreShield® pad (top): foam core stays clean, product held at the microfibre face. Standard applicator pad (bottom) after application: visible product absorption throughout.
Standard pad top view with microfibre peeled back showing pink product absorption
Standard pad, microfibre peeled back.
Standard pad cross-section close-up showing pink product driven deep into foam
Standard pad cross-section: product driven deep into the foam.

Testing shown with a coloured product (Hell Shine The Abyss) for visibility. CoreShield® works the same way with clear ceramic coatings.

The honest claim

Our testing shows CoreShield® applicator pads absorb up to 33% less ceramic coating than a standard foam pad, averaging 15–16% less across all runs.

We use 'up to 33%' in our marketing because that's what our testing showed. We don't round up. We don't extrapolate. These are our own results from our own testing with a real ceramic coating product.

More product on your paint. Less wasted in the pad. That's the CoreShield® difference.

About the CoreShield® liner

Exploded diagram of CoreShield pad layers: Microfibre Application Face, Core Shield Liner, Centre Sponge, Microfibre Layer, Finger Pocket
The five-layer CoreShield® construction — with the Anti-Saturation liner sitting behind the microfibre face.

The Anti-Saturation liner sits between the microfibre application face and the foam core of the pad. Its function is simple — to act as a barrier that prevents liquid ceramic coatings, waxes and sealants from migrating into the foam under application pressure.

Without a liner, every squeeze of the pad during application drives product deeper into the foam. With CoreShield®, that product stays where it belongs — on the surface of the pad, ready to be transferred to your paint.

Shop CoreShield® Pads